E.M. Chemicals v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
In this customs case, the initial classification by the United States Customs Service of certain liquid crystals as chemical mixtures was reversed on summary judgment by the United States Court of International Trade, which held that the liquid crystals should be classified as parts of indicator panels. E.M. Chemicals v. United States, 728 F.Supp. 723 (1989). The government appeals this judgment. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Liquid crystals are compounds or mixtures which combine the properties of liquids and crystals, i.e., they have fluidity, but at the same time have optical…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Stewart-Warner Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Daw Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Siemens America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- NEC America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Lynteq, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Totes, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.