Legal Opinion

Building Industry Assn. v. City of Livermore

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1996No. A070517PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

This case presents a single straightforward issue: can California cities require builders to install residential fire sprinkler systems in new or substantially remodeled single-family dwellings? The simple answer to this question is “yes.” Unfortunately, because the Legislature has not spoken clearly concerning this issue, the analysis which leads to this conclusion is neither straightforward nor simple.

I

Facts

In 1992 the City of Livermore (City) updated its building code by enacting ordinance No. 1389. Ordinance No. 1389 adopted the 1991 version of the Uniform Building…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Moore v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reyes v. KoshaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Lippman v. City of Oakland, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Griffith v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. California Apartment Ass'n v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Fujitsu IT Holdings, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API