Legal Opinion

O'MALLEY v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1941No. Civ. A. 209PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in his complaint alleges that he is, and was prior to June 1, 1935, a carrier by motor vehicle transporting goods in interstate commerce for the general public and for specific contract shippers;. that he is and was entitled to have issued to him, under the provisions of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq., a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing him to continue his operations as a motor carrier; that he filed application with the Commission therefor on December 4, 1935; that, after a hearing, his application was denied; and that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Shields v. Utah Idaho Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Western Paper Makers' Chemical Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. United States v. MaherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thomson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1941
  3. United States v. Railway Exp. Agency, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
  4. Moore v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1941
  5. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API