Legal Opinion

Wilson v. United States

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided August 24, 1953No. 924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGE, District Judge.

On reconsideration of a Division No. 5 order favorable to petitioners’ application for a certificate of convenience and necessity as a contract motor carrier, the Interstate Commerce Commission (two members dissenting and one member not participating) found “that • applicants (petitioners) * * * have failed to show that the proposed operation will be consistent with the public interest and the national transportation policy, and that the application should be denied.” Petitioners brought the instant review action to annul, set aside and enjoin said order. We have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Western Paper Makers' Chemical Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Crichton v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  5. Crichton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sawyer Transport, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Dixie Highway Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1965
  3. Salvino v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1954
  4. Acme Fast Freight, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  5. DeCamp Bus Lines v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API