Legal Opinion

Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. State

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1923No. 396 and 429PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Brandéis

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Section 22 of the Act to Regulate Commerce, as amended by Act of March 2, 1889, c. 382, § 9, 25 Stat. 855, 862, provides, among other things,

“ That nothing in this act shall prevent the carriage, storage, or handling of property free or at reduced rates for the United States, State, or-municipal governments, or for charitable purposes, or to or from fairs and expositions for exhibition thereat, . . .”

Whether this section should be construed as denying to the Interstate Commerce Commission power to prohibit such reduced rates, even where…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Manufacturers Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Board of Trade of Kansas City v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API