Interstate Commerce Commission v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.
District Court, D. North Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This suit is brought by the Interstate Commerce Commission under authority of Section 222(b) of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 U.S.C.A. § 322(b). Its object is to restrain operations by the defendant between Marmarth, North Dakota, and Miles City, Montana, which the plaintiff alleges are unlawful. The matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction against said operations.
The factual situation, there being no controversy to the same, may be stated as follows:
The defendant is a common carrier by motor vehicle in interstate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- De Sollar v. HanscomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Powell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Venner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Tampa Phosphate Railroad Company v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Schwartz v. BowmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- United States v. Railway Exp. Agency, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.