Legal Opinion

Lombard Brothers, Inc. v. General Asset Management Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 31, 1983No. 10911PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation. The plaintiff, Lombard Brothers, Incorporated (Lombard), brought an action in twelve counts seeking monetary and other relief for losses sustained in various securities transactions. Although its complaint originally sought relief only from its investment advisor, the defendant General Asset Management Company, Inc. (GAM), and GAM’s associates, the complaint was subsequently amended to cite in various securities dealers who executed the disputed financial transactions. One of these…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. Thomason v. Chemical BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Knipple v. Viking Communications, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Rosenblit v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API