Legal Opinion
Pro Performance Corporate Services, Inc. v. Frank Goldman
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 20, 2002No. CV01 0186618 SUnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HON. FRANK H. D’ANDREA, JR., JUDGE TRIAL REFEREE.
This action originates from an unpaid debt arising out of a transaction between the plaintiff, Pro Performance Corporate Services, Inc., and the nonresident defendant, Frank Goldman. The plaintiff alleges the following facts: It is a corporation located in Stamford, and is in the business of providing tickets and related services for, inter aha, major sporting events. On or about January 18, 2001, the defendant, a resident of Baltimore, Maryland, contacted the plaintiff by telephone for the purpose of retaining the plaintiff in order to locate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomason v. Chemical BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Zartolas v. NisenfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Knipple v. Viking Communications, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Brookridge District Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Coughlin v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vertrue Inc. v. MeshkinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Milne v. Catuogno Court Reporting Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Goudis v. American Currency Trading Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Olkin v. ViveirosDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025