Youngblood v. North State Ford Truck Sales
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
The sole issue for review is whether, with respect to the work in which he was engaged at the time of his injury, plaintiff was an “employee” of defendant North State Ford Truck Sales (North State) within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Act. We conclude that he was North State’s employee and accordingly affirm the Court of Appeals.
Plaintiff was seriously injured and permanently disabled on 23 July 1984 while instructing defendant North State’s employees in the use of Kansas Jack equipment to repair the frames of heavy vehicles. The compensation hearing was limited by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Lucas v. Li'l General StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Lemmerman v. A. T. Williams Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Coastal Plains Utilities, Inc. v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Carroll v. Daniels & Daniels Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Barber v. Going West Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- McCown v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Peace River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ward Transformer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.