State v. Davis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
In the record on appeal defendant Foster lists 103 assignments of error. Of these he brings forward 19, setting them out in his brief in the manner required by Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, N.C.G.S. Vol. 4A, Append. I (1970). Defendant Davis lists 104 assignments, all except No. 104, being identical in number and content with those of Foster. Davis has attempted to bring forward all but three of his assignments. In general disregard of Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, he has attempted to correlate all 101 of them within seven groups. He…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. AdcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.