Legal Opinion
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,309 Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 30, 1992No. 91-1915PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
In this “failure to warn” case, plaintiffs-appellants Maryanne Garside and her daughter, Milissa, appeal the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee McKesson Corporation (“McKesson”). Because we conclude that the district court’s entry of summary judgment was premature, we reverse.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Summary judgment is appropriate where “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Solimene v. B. GRAUEL & CO., KGMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Charolette Payne v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc., Russell Violette v. Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Motus v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.