Legal Opinion
Solimene v. B. GRAUEL & CO., KG
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 4, 1987PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
On October 8, 1975, the plaintiff, Maria F. Solimene, was injured while working with an industrial machine manufactured by the defendant, B. Grauel & Co., KG (Grauel). The plaintiff sought damages from Eastern Marking Machine Corporation (Eastern), which, she alleged, distributed the machine to her employer, and from the machine’s manufacturer, Grauel, on the theories of negligent design and breach of warranty. After trial, the jury found that Grauel was negligent and had violated its warranty of merchantability. 2 We granted the defendant’s petition for direct appellate review.
Grauel raises…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Chardon v. Fumero SotoSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Draghetti v. ChmielewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Buster v. George W. Moore, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Boothby v. Texon, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc. v. Commissioner of Department of Mental RetardationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.