Legal Opinion

Motus v. Pfizer Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided December 20, 2001No. CV00-298 AHMPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DEFENDANT

MATZ, District Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

Six days after Dr. Gerald Trostler prescribed Zoloft to Victor Motus, Mr. Motus took his life. His widow, Flora Motus, sued Zoloft’s manufacturer, Pfizer Inc., for failing to adequately warn that Zoloft can cause those who ingest it to commit suicide. She alleges five claims: (1) “wrongful death/negligence”; (2) strict liability; (3) “survival action”; (4) fraud; and (5) breach of warranty. Each of Ms. Motus’s claims is premised on the allegation that Pfizer’s “package insert and marketing materials do not warn ...…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Stephen Wendell v. Glaxosmithkline LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Motus v. Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Tapia v. Davol, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
  5. Miller v. Alza Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API