United States v. Mayer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
The district court properly denied Casey Dale Mayer’s motion to suppress, because (1) officers had probable cause to believe that Mayer lived at the residence they searched and (2) the conditions of his probation authorized the search. We also hold that the district court properly found that Mayer’s prior conviction for first-degree burglary in Oregon was a predicate “violent felony” under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”). In the ordinary case, conduct falling within Oregon’s first degree burglary statute presents a serious possibility of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. RooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Gallagher v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- United States v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.