Legal Opinion

State v. Langdon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2000No. CC 95-04-32422; CA A94048; SC S44978PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.

The issue in this criminal case is whether consecutive sentences imposed under Ballot Measure 11, adopted by the people in 1994, Or Laws 1995, ch 2, § 1, are subject to the limitation on incarceration terms prescribed by the Oregon Felony Sentencing Guidelines (sentencing guidelines). The Court of Appeals concluded that Measure 11 sentences are not subject to those limitations. State v. Langdon, 151 Or App 640, 950 P2d 410 (1997). For the reasons that follow, we agree. We therefore affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I. INTRODUCTION

We begin by reviewing the statutes upon which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ShumwayOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. LangdonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Arken v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. United States v. Ronald Lester ParryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. State v. Ferman-VelascoOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2003

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API