Legal Opinion
DePuy v. Board of Retirement
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1978No. Civ. 16691PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLOGNE, Acting P. J.
Quentin R. DePuy, employed by the County of San Diego, petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 to review the decision of the Board of Retirement of the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association (Board). The Board had granted him a nonservice-connected disability retirement, but expressly denied the disability was service connected. The superior court granted the writ, ordering the Board to grant DePuy a service-connected disability retirement pension. The Board appeals.
DePuy was first employed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jorgensen v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Heaton v. Marin County Employees Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Pathe v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bowen v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Glover v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Valero v. Board of Retirement of Tulare County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Hoffman v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Lundak v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.