Legal Opinion
Valero v. Board of Retirement of Tulare County Employees' Retirement Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 1, 2012No. F062601PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
Respondent Board of Retirement of Tulare County Employees’ Retirement Association (the Board) denied the application of appellant Joe Valero for a service-connected disability retirement. Valero petitioned the superior court for an administrative writ of mandate directing the Board to grant him a service-connected disability retirement. He contended that a disabling psychiatric condition, a panic disorder which the Board concedes he suffers from, was service connected. The Board contended that the condition was not service connected. The court denied Valero’s petition.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. D.W.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Dickey v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Bowen v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Superior Court of Fresno Cnty. v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Ada-Saucedo v. Pragmatic Communications Systems CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Burke v. Clovis Unified School District CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Franzen v. Brookfield Southland Builders CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Fresno Superior Court v. PERBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.