Glover v. Board of Retirement
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*1330Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Petitioner John Glover appeals from judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate seeking to reverse the decision of respondent Board of Retirement of the County of Los Angeles, that although he was disabled from performing the duties of his job, the disability was not service-connected. Appellant1 contends that Glover’s disability was service-connected because he was engaged in active law enforcement thus entitled to the heart trouble presumption of section 31720.5 of the Government Code; and that the finding that the disability is not service-connected is not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bowen v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Neeley v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Kimball v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Gorman v. CranstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Alberda v. Board of Retirement of Fresno County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- K.R. v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- California Statewide Law Enforcement Ass'n v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Riverside Sheriffs'assn. v. Bd. of Admin., Cal. Pub. Empl's'ret. Syst.California Court of Appeal · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.