DeEsso v. Litzie
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.
*788 In this tort action, the plaintiff, Mitchell DeEsso, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, accepting the jury's verdict and awarding him $5000 in economic damages. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly denied his motions to set aside the verdict and to order additur because: (1) the jury's award of economic damages was contrary to the uncontested evidence of the plaintiff's medical bills and lost wages; and (2) the jury's decision to award zero noneconomic damages was inconsistent with its decision to award $5000 in economic damages. We affirm the judgment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Marchetti v. RamirezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Esaw v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Schroeder v. Triangulum AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cusano v. LajoieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Maldonado v. FlannerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- Deesso v. LitzieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Hassett v. Secor's Auto Center, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022