Legal Opinion

DeEsso v. Litzie

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 9, 2017No. AC38046PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.

*788 In this tort action, the plaintiff, Mitchell DeEsso, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, accepting the jury's verdict and awarding him $5000 in economic damages. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly denied his motions to set aside the verdict and to order additur because: (1) the jury's award of economic damages was contrary to the uncontested evidence of the plaintiff's medical bills and lost wages; and (2) the jury's decision to award zero noneconomic damages was inconsistent with its decision to award $5000 in economic damages. We affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Marchetti v. RamirezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Esaw v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Schroeder v. Triangulum AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cusano v. LajoieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Maldonado v. FlannerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  3. Deesso v. LitzieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Hassett v. Secor's Auto Center, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API