Legal Opinion

Gladu v. Sousa

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 15, 2000No. SC 16125PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification1 was improvidently granted.

In brief, the plaintiff, Helen Gladu, filed a motion for additur following the jury’s verdict awarding economic damages only. The trial court granted that motion, adding an award of noneconomic damages, and, after the defendant refused the additur, ordered a new trial on the issue of damages. The defendant, Joao Sousa, *192appealed from the trial court’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Johnson v. FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Gladu v. SousaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. Gladu v. SousaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Triangulum AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Snell v. BeamonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Silva v. Walgreen Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Maldonado v. FlannerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  5. Frazier v. Konopka, No. Cv 98-0490379 S (Jan. 25, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API