Legal Opinion
State v. George
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 28, 1995No. 12119PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21.1 The defendant claims that the risk of injury statute is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the facts of this case. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. On November 15, 1991, at approximately 5:40 p.m., Officer Ellen Stoldt of the East Hartford police responded to a report that an infant had been left in a car in a parking lot. She discovered a seventeen *390month old…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. PickeringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. DennisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. PerruccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. PalangioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- State v. ErzenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. BranhamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Shane P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. Maurice M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. HopkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.