Legal Opinion
State v. Branham
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 18, 2000No. AC 18065PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CRETELLA, J.
The defendant, Todd Branham, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of four counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 53-21 and one count of assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53U-61,1 claiming that (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion for judgment of acquittal on counts three, four and five of the substitute information because there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction, and (2) that § 53-21 is unconsti*397tutionally vague on its face and as applied…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. PickeringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. SorabellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. Maurice M.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. Lamont FieldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. SmallsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.