Legal Opinion
In re Shane P.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 13, 2000No. AC 19430PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The respondent father2 appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his minor child, Shane P. He claims that (1) the court’s finding that he abandoned Shane constituted an unconstitutional deprivation of due process, (2) the court improperly found that he failed to achieve sufficient personal rehabilitation, (3) the statutory grounds of abandonment and failure to achieve rehabilitation pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 17a-112, as bases for the termination of parental rights, are unconstitutionally vague as applied…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re Samantha C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Manifold v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 2663Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.