Legal Opinion
State v. Palangio
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 26, 1991No. 8610PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
After consolidation of two separate proceedings, the state, in a substitute information, charged the defendant with three counts of risk of injury to, or impairing the morals of, children in violation of General Statutes § 53-21.1 The defendant entered pleas of not guilty and the jury found him guilty of all three counts. On appeal, the defendant claims that General Statutes § 53-21 is unconstitutionally vague and over-broad as applied to him and that the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are pertinent to this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. ZarickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. Robert H.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- In re Shane P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.