Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1938No. Docket No. 47, Calendar No. 39,971PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

April 18,1927, plaintiff while employed by defendant suffered an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. At that time he was employed as a resaw operator and it is conceded this was skilled labor. It was claimed he was permanently and totally disabled from continuing in the work in which he was employed. However, he returned to work for his employer in another employment ; and after he returned to work he was again seriously injured July 1, 1930, and compensation was paid for this injury to August 2, 1930. January 8, 1933, plaintiff became totally disabled from performing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bond v. MarkstrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Geis v. Packard Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Jameson v. Walter S. Newhall Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Miller v. S. Fair & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Milton v. Oakland CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Ayers v. GenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Negrón Marrero v. C.I.T. Financial Services Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1981

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API