Bond v. Markstrum
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gogebic. (Haire, J.) Debt. Defendant briúgs error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hooker J.
An action was brought against the defendant, as guarantor of payment and performance under a lease, to recover for two months5 rent of the premises. An action had previously been brought and recovery had by plaintiffs against the defendant upon this lease and assignment for earlier installments of rent. The judge admitted the record of the former proceedings, and instructed the jury that such proceedings conclusively established certain facts which entitled plaintiffs to recover the rent sued for, unless the defendant had proved to their satisfaction, by a preponderance of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Burlen v. ShannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Perkins v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Hebert v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Creek v. LaskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Hollingsworth v. HicksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Harrington v. Huff & Mitchell Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.