Legal Opinion

Hanna v. . Stedman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1921PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an unanimous judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 7, 1919, in favor of defendant upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Hiscock, Ch. J.

This appeal requires us to determine, first, which of two conflicting judgments rendered respectively by courts of the states of New York and Maryland was the superior and controlling adjudication upon rights here involved, and, secondly, if we should decide that the Maryland judgment was originally the controlling one, whether the right to enforce that judgment injfchis state has become barred by the Statute of Limitations.

'"The defendant is a voluntary, unincorporated fraternal beneficiary association which during all the times in question has maintained its principal office…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Irving Nat. Bank v. LawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  3. Porter v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Hall v. Wilder Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. Seaboard Terminals Corporation v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API