Legal Opinion
Irving Nat. Bank v. Law
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 1, 1926No. 46PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge.
Upon rehearing, the plaintiff brings to our attention two cases decided by the Court of Appeals of New York, which neither party cited at the first argument, and which we did not discover for ourselves, perhaps because they do not cite Isenberg v. Rainier, 145 App. Div. 256, 130 N. Y. S. 27. These are Klotz v. Angle, 220 N. Y. 347, 116 N. E. 24, and Hanna v. Stedman, 230 N. Y. 326, 130 N. E. 566, and they seem to us conclusively to construe section 13 of the New York Civil Practice Act in the sense that the plaintiff desires.
In Klotz v. Angle three causes of action in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Norton v. LarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Joseph Gelb v. Royal Globe Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. L'OreaL Usa, Inc. Redkin 5th Avenue, N.Y.CCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Morris A. Hicks, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. The Quaker Oats CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.