Legal Opinion

State v. Carter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1975No. 54PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to strike the testimony of Homer Wright and to suppress the testimony of Fred Hurst, and in allowing the introduction of certain photographs. The record discloses that a district court judge and Superior Court Judge Grist entered orders directing the State to make available to defendant, among other information, a list of all prospective witnesses for the State and any tangible evidence that might be used against him.

The trial judge, upon hearing defendant’s motion, found that no photographs had been…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. DetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API