Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Patterson v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1996No. 1994-1776PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Appellant’s weekly award of $33.11 was based upon R.C. 4127.04, which provides:
“The basis upon which compensation or benefits shall be computed, is the amount of work-relief which would have been afforded to the injured person for the calendar week in which the injury or death occurred. In no event shall such compensation exceed the maximum reimbursement relief award established by the state which the claimant would have been entitled to had he not been injured.”
Appellant claims that her award should not have been based upon R.C. 4127.04, but, rather, former R.C. 4123.59(B), which provided:
“In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Kinney v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Adamsky v. Buckeye Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Doersam v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Nyitray v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
- Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. BatistaOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Liposchak v. Administrator, Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.