Legal Opinion
Watt v. All Clear Business Solutions, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 13, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-0595PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff George J. Watt has moved to reopen discovery for the limited purpose of designating economic expert Dr. Richard Lurito to project the present value of Watt’s future medical costs. Defendant All Clear Business Solutions, LLC (“All Clear”) opposes the motion, arguing that Watt has failed to comply with court-ordered discovery deadlines and that allowing this additional expert will considerably delay trial. Magistrate Judge Alan Kay recommends that the motion be granted. Though Watt’s delay was avoidable, there is good…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vineberg v. BissonnetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Trebor Sportswear Co., Inc. And Rotano Sportswear Co., Inc., Plaintiffs v. The Limited Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc. v. Guest Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Childers v. SlaterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Bakalar v. VavraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. Science Applications International Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Lopez v. Timeco Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.