Legal Opinion
In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 9, 2015No. MDL Docket No. 1869; Misc. No. 07-0489 (PLF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge
At this late stage, defendants have moved for leave tó late file a declaration from Dr. B. Kelly Eakin of Laurits R. Christensen Associates, Inc. Dr. Eakin purportedly was the “lead investigator and author” of certain portions of a study (the “Christensen Study”) commissioned by the Surface Transportation Board that was published in November 2009. See *2Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Reply Ex. 115 (filed May 28, 2014) [Dkt. No. 711-24]. Plaintiffs’ experts have cited that study as support for. their use of a constant fuel coefficient in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Childers v. SlaterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Watt v. All Clear Business Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
3Cited by3 opinions
- Breen v. MinetaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Jessie Perkins, et al. v. Sandy Spring Builders, LLC, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026