Legal Opinion

Asian Women United of Minnesota v. Leiendecker

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 2010No. A10-402PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

This appeal is from a district court order denying appellant’s request for an advance from respondent corporation, her former employer, to fund her defense of claims that respondent asserted against her. Because the district court did not make an independent determination of whether appellant is entitled to an advance, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Sinuon Leiendecker is a former executive director for respondent Asian Women United of Minnesota (AWUM), a Minnesota nonprofit corporation. The facts underlying her employment and the termination of her employment are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Homestore, Inc. v. TafeenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  5. City of Minneapolis v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API