Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
For the past 10 years, respondents Sin-uon Leiendecker and her husband Lawrence Leiendecker have been embroiled in litigation with appellant Asian Women United of Minnesota (“AWUM”), a nonprofit organization that Sinuon once directed and for which Lawrence, an attorney, once did pro bono work. In this case, the fifth in a series of lawsuits between the parties, the Leiendeckers contend that AWUM and the other defendants committed various torts by suing the Leiendeck-ers in the past. In response, AWUM sought dismissal under Minnesota’s anti-SLAPP statutes, Minn.Stat. §§…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND RAND SIMBERG v. MICHAEL E. MANN, NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. MICHAEL E. MANNDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Davis v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- R.J. Zayed v. Associated Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.