Legal Opinion

Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 2014No. Nos. A12-1978, A12-2015PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRAS, Justice.

For the past 10 years, respondents Sin-uon Leiendecker and her husband Lawrence Leiendecker have been embroiled in litigation with appellant Asian Women United of Minnesota (“AWUM”), a nonprofit organization that Sinuon once directed and for which Lawrence, an attorney, once did pro bono work. In this case, the fifth in a series of lawsuits between the parties, the Leiendeckers contend that AWUM and the other defendants committed various torts by suing the Leiendeck-ers in the past. In response, AWUM sought dismissal under Minnesota’s anti-SLAPP statutes, Minn.Stat. §§…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Lundgren v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE AND RAND SIMBERG v. MICHAEL E. MANN, NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. MICHAEL E. MANNDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Davis v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  3. R.J. Zayed v. Associated Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  4. Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API