Legal Opinion
Bechik Products, Inc. v. Flexible Products, Inc., a Corporation, and Morris Goldstein, Max Goldstein and Leo Goldstein, D/B/A Crown Mattress Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 9, 1955No. 349, Docket 23685PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Circuit Judge.
Bechik Products commenced an action against Flexible Products and one of the latter’s customers, Crown Mattress Company, alleging (1) infringement of its Patent No. Re. 22,807 by Flexible in making and selling patented mattress handles and (2) contributory infringement by Crown in using the handles in mattresses of its manufacture. Flexible counterclaimed for a judgment declaring the patent noniñfringed and for a temporary and permanent injunction enjoining plaintiff’(1) from representing that Flexible or any of its customers are infringing the patent and (2) from suing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Kaplan v. Helenhart Novelty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Zoomar, Inc. v. Paillard Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Telephonics Corporation and Fabrionics Corporation v. Lindly & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Hayes Spray Gun Co. v. E. C. Brown Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- American Chemical Paint Company, a Corporation v. Thompson Chemical Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.