Legal Opinion

Tonuci v. Beegal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1958No. Appeal, 217PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below opening a judgment entered on a bond and warrant of attorney accompanying a mortgage. On December 16, 1955 the defendant, owner of premises 3935-39 Pine Street, Philadelphia (hereinafter referred to as the “Pine property”), arranged with Samuel Melnick, an attorney, plaintiff’s husband, for a loan in the amount of $3,600.00 to be secured by bond and mortgage upon the Pine property. As part of the same transaction and on the same date Melnick entered into a written agreement with defendant by the terms of which Mel-nick…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sidle v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Yezbak v. CroceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Teats v. Anderson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Mitchell v. First National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Otto WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shiner v. MoriartySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Frank v. PeckichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Washburn v. Northern Health Facilities, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Bradney v. SakelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Coulter EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API