Teats v. Anderson Et Ux.

Opinion by

Mb. Chief Justice Maxey,

Plaintiff filed a bill in equity to set aside a deed to defendants alleging misrepresentation, duress and coercion, and that she was of poor physical condition, mentally unstable and senile and did not have the capacity to understand the nature of a real estate transaction. The court en banc sustained the chancellor’s decree invalidating the conveyance. Defendants appealed.

On the evening of October 25,1945, defendants Curtis T. and Eva K. Anderson, husband and wife, accompanied by their attorney and a notary public visited the home of plaintiff and her…