Legal Opinion
Shiner v. Moriarty
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 1998PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
Eugene P. and Jane E. Moriarty appeal from the order that denied their motions for judgments notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Jane Moriarty also appeals from that portion of the order that denied her request for a remittur. Maurice A. Nernberg, Jr., James R. Cooney, and Nern-berg & Laffey, P.C. (“attorney defendants”) appeal from the portion of the same order that denied their motions for post-trial relief. These appeals are consolidated for our review.
This action is a later installment of the continuing legal saga involving the Moriartys (formerly named the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- International Paper Co. v. OuelletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- General Refractories Company Grefco, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company Gilberg & Kiernan Andrew Butz General Refractories CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Hollock v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Lerner v. LernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Reading Radio, Inc. v. FinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.