Legal Opinion
New York State Voters League against Vivisection, Inc. v. Hilleboe
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNathan, J.
On this motion for a temporary injunction, it becomes unnecessary to determine the question of whether or not either of the plaintiffs would be entitled to injunctive relief, since the Metcalf-Hatch Law (L. 1952, ch. 96) which is here under attack, is found not to be unconstitutional.
This law amends the Public Health Law of the State by adding section 5-a. It authorizes the State Commissioner of Health to designate approved laboratories or institutions wherein scientific tests, experiments or investigations involving the use of living animals may be performed or conducted under prescribed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Nicchia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Fox v. Mohawk & Hudson River Humane SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Blair v. Du MondNew York Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. . NicchiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schnapp v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- New York Telephone Co. v. Secord Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1970
- Dog Owners Ass'n of New York State, Inc. v. HilleboeNew York Supreme Court · 1953
- New York State Voters League Against Vivisection, Inc. v. HilleboeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953