Legal Opinion

Blair v. Du Mond

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElsworth, J.

The relief sought in this action is a judgment declaring that section 115 of the Agriculture and Markets Law of the State of New Tork, pertaining to the night quarantine of dogs, is unconstitutional, and restraining its enforcement against the plaintiff. The section, which was originated in 1917, provides in its present form as enacted in 1929 (L. 1929, ch. 173), in part as follows: “ The commissioner may at any time by order require that all dogs in any town, city or county, shall be securely confined between sunset and one hour after sunrise during the period of time designated in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nicchia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Fox v. Mohawk & Hudson River Humane SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. People Ex Rel. Doscher v. . SissonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Preudhomme v. StebbinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Borie v. HabesWebster Justice of the Peace Court · 1967
  2. Schnapp v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. New York State Voters League against Vivisection, Inc. v. HilleboeNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API