Legal Opinion
Dog Owners Ass'n of New York State, Inc. v. Hilleboe
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, J.
This was originally an action by three corporate and two individual plaintiffs to declare the Metcalf-Hatch Act (L. 1952, ch. 96) unconstitutional and to enjoin defendant Hilleboe from proceeding thereunder. A motion made to dismiss the causes of action on behalf of one corporate and the two individual plaintiffs was granted by Mr. Justice Eager (Central Westchester Humane Soc. v. Hilleboe, 202 Misc. 881). The matter then came on for trial before this court sitting in Special Term, Part II, in January of 1953. Plaintiffs submitted no evidence but moved for declaratory judgment on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Barrett v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Nicchia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Fox v. Mohawk & Hudson River Humane SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Graybar Electric Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schnapp v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Poersch v. EldridgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1981