Nicchia v. New York
Supreme Court of the United States
error to the county court of kings county, state OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Plaintiff in error owned two dogs which she,harbored within New York City without having obtained the license required by c. 115, Laws of New York 1894, as amended by c. 412, Laws 1895, and c. 495, Laws 1902. She was charged with violating the statute, on October 11, 1916, found guilty in the City Magistrates’ Court, Brooklyn, and required to pay a fine. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment without opinion.
Chapter 115 as amended provides:
‘ ‘ Sec. 1. Every person who owns or harbors one or more dogs within the corporate limits of any city having a population of over eight hundred…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Davis v. American Society for Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Fox v. Mohawk & Hudson River Humane SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People ex rel. State Board of Charities v. New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to ChildrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by76 opinions
- Fabrikant v. FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Dias v. City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- People v. OlguinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Howes Bros. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.