Legal Opinion
Clynch v. Chapman
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 30, 2003No. 3:01CV1685(JBA)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 18]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff William Clynch (“Clynch”) brings this suit against defendants Steve Chapman (“Chapman”), James Garofalo (“Garofalo”), and Salvatore Froschino (“Frosehino”), police officers employed by the City of Derby, Connecticut, in their individual capacities only, alleging federal and state constitutional violations, and violations of Connecticut common law arising from his arrest on November 1, 2000 for driving under the influence (“DUI”) in violation of Conn. Gen.Stat. § 14-227a(a)(l). 1
Under 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Walczyk v. RioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Edward Root, Jr. v. Timothy Liston, Docket No. 05-2004-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Rynn v. JaffeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Burkett v. City of El PasoDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
- Maloney v. CuomoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.