Legal Opinion
James v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 11, 2009No. Civil PJM 08-2821PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION
PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.
Peter James brought this action against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), alleging violation of his rights of freedom of speech and association under the United States Constitution and the Maryland Bill of Rights. 1 See U.S. Const, amend. I; Md. Const, art. 40.
WMATA has filed a Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment [Paper No. 13], asserting that James has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. James contends, inter alia, that WMATA’s regulation regarding…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tapp v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Headen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Price v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Banneker Ventures, LLC v. GrahamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Bell v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.