Legal Opinion

People v. Bhakta

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 2008No. B190437PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLIER, J.

Appellants Rameshbhai C. Bhakta, Manharbhai G. Bhakta and Sarojben D. Bhakta, individually and doing business as Boulevard Motel, appeal from a judgment and amended judgment in favor of respondent the People of the State of California and an award to respondent of $100,000 in attorney fees and costs. The judgments permanently enjoin appellants from facilitating or encouraging prostitution, or providing a place where prostitution can occur on the premises, pursuant to the “Red Light Abatement Law” (Pen. Code, § 11225 et seq.) and unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, §…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Nationwide Biweekly Admin., Inc. v. Superior Court of Alameda Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Hartnett v. San Diego County Office of Education CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API