People v. Bhakta
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
Appellants Rameshbhai C. Bhakta, Manharbhai G. Bhakta and Sarojben D. Bhakta, individually and doing business as Boulevard Motel, appeal from a judgment and amended judgment in favor of respondent the People of the State of California and an award to respondent of $100,000 in attorney fees and costs. The judgments permanently enjoin appellants from facilitating or encouraging prostitution, or providing a place where prostitution can occur on the premises, pursuant to the “Red Light Abatement Law” (Pen. Code, § 11225 et seq.) and unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, §…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. HyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Nationwide Biweekly Admin., Inc. v. Superior Court of Alameda Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Hartnett v. San Diego County Office of Education CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.