Legal Opinion
Nationwide Biweekly Admin., Inc. v. Superior Court of Alameda Cnty.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 13, 2018No. A150264PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanke, J.
*442I. INTRODUCTION
Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc., Loan Payment Administration, LLC, and Daniel S. Lipsky, the alleged alter ego, principal and sole shareholder of Nationwide and Loan Payment (collectively petitioners) operate a debt payment service that claims to reduce the amount of interest owed by accelerating debt repayment via an extra annual payment. The California Department of Business Oversight and the District Attorneys of four counties (collectively the People) challenge a number of petitioners' business practices and in the underlying action seek civil penalties under…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curtis S. Ridlon v. New Hampshire Bureau of Securities RegulationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- Douglas v. HillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Rincon EV Realty LLC v. CP III Rincon Towers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019