Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Redona

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1921No. Civ. No. 3164PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Helen R. Solomon, now deceased, brought this action for a partition of real property alleged to be owned by herself and two of the defendants as tenants in common. From an interlocutory decree in favor of plaintiff the defendant Carlos Redona appeals. Helen R. Solomon having died after the appeal was perfected, the administrator of her estate was duly substituted as plaintiff in her stead. Notwithstanding the substitution, we shall, for convenience, refer to Helen R. Solomon as the plaintiff and respondent, just as though she were still alive and prosecuting the appeal in her own name.

One of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. O'Connor v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ferris v. Montgomery Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Sutter v. San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Ambassador Petroleum Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Pope v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API