Legal Opinion

Kniefel v. Keller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1940No. 32,170PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Interveners appeal from an order sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to their complaint in intervention upon the ground that the facts alleged therein “do not constitute a cause of action.” The court’s memorandum assigns as reasons for its order:

Interveners “are strangers to” and “have no interest whatever” in this action; all allegations by them pleaded and upon which they rely “may properly be interposed” by defendants in the main action; plaintiff claims nothing as against them, “and if plaintiff at the end of the lawsuit is successful in making any recovery against…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Federal Land Bank v. KoslofskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Sage v. HampeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Jessewich v. AbbeneCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Robinson v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Cauble v. . TrexlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Matter of Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Oregon & Western Colonization Co. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. May v. WhitbeckMontana Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API