Legal Opinion

Russell v. RUSSELL'S APPLIANCE SERVICE

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 12, 2001PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.

[¶ 1] The employee, Stephen W. Russell, appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying his petition for review. Russell’s employer, without seeking prior approval of the Board, discontinued Russell’s workers’ compensation benefits after paying 400 weeks of partial incapacity benefits. When Russell received a notice from the employer that his benefits would end in ten days, Russell sought review from the Board. The hearing officer held that Russell was entitled to a twenty-one day notice of discontinuation, and because the employer failed to provide…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Cust v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Toothaker v. Lauri, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. Williams v. E.S. Boulos Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bridgeman v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Jasch v. Anchorage InnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  3. McKeeman v. Cianbro Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  4. Baker v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. Doucette v. Hallsmith/Sysco Food Services, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API