Legal Opinion

Doucette v. Hallsmith/Sysco Food Services, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 9, 2011No. WCB-10-669PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and LEVY, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR, JJ.

Concurring: SAUFLEY, C.J., and LEVY, and GORMAN, JJ.

Concurring/Dissenting: ALEXANDER, J.

SILVER, J.

[¶ 1] Hallsmith/Sysco Food Services, Inc. (Sysco), appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Collier; HO) awarding Matthew Doucette the protection of the Act for a 2004 work injury and total incapacity benefits for a violation of the “fourteen-day rule.” See Me. W.C.B. Rule, ch. 1, § 1. Sysco contends that the award for the fourteen-day rule violation should be vacated because (1) the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bureau v. Staffing Network, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. Musk v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. Stickles v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Guaranty Fund Management Services v. Workers' Compensation BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Hird v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Victor S. Urrutia v. Interstate Brands InternationalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  2. Estate of Joyce v. Commercial Welding Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. Fay E. Johnson v. The Home Depot USA, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Gerald Marshall v. Town of DexterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  5. Doughty v. Work Opportunities Unlimited/Leddy GroupSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API